{"id":1735,"date":"2008-02-05T11:00:54","date_gmt":"2008-02-05T11:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mobiadnews.com\/?p=1735"},"modified":"2008-02-06T18:34:32","modified_gmt":"2008-02-06T18:34:32","slug":"conference-report-mobile-advertising-and-marketing-usa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.mobiadnews.com\/?p=1735","title":{"rendered":"Mobile Ad Conference Affirms Brands Are Starting To Move"},"content":{"rendered":"

san_fran.gifLast week in San Francisco, Informa held their Mobile Advertising and Marketing USA<\/strong> conference. There were speakers from all parts of the mobile advertising value chain as well as from all regions of the world. This post looks at the key discussion topics. <\/p>\n

A partial list of the companies represented includes:
\n\u2022 Operators \u2013 Virgin, Sprint, Blyk, Hutchison, Helio<\/strong>
\n\u2022 Agencies \u2013 AKQA, R\/GA, Ogilvy, Aerodeon, Sponge, Ansible, Hyperfactory, ipsh!, Incentivated<\/strong>
\n\u2022 Mobile Ad companies \u2013 Ad Infuse, MadHouse, Amdocs, AdMob, Third Screen<\/strong>
\n\u2022 Search companies \u2013 Medio, Yahoo, JumpTap, MCN<\/strong>
\n(see conference website<\/a> for full speaker list)<\/p>\n

The venue was such that it encouraged a lot of audience interaction during the presentations, and during the break it was easy to meet everyone for some 1-on-1 conversation.<\/p>\n

While its impossible to condense 2 full days of presentations and discussion into a brief article, here are some of the key themes raised at the conference.<\/p>\n

Brands: <\/span>
\nFinally we’re starting to hear from agencies that more brands are moving past the “test and trial<\/strong>” phase, and are viewing mobile as an ongoing part of their media plan. The budgets are often still relatively small, but the budgets are growing and a lot of the brands are placing “repeat orders<\/strong>” without the need for an agency to justify mobile all over again. <\/p>\n

Mobile Operators:<\/span>
\nI’ve been noticing recently that the relationship between mobile operators and the rest of the mobile advertising community seems to depend a lot on which region you look at. European operators in general seem to be fundamentally cooperative and working to facilitate the overall growth of mobile advertising. For many of them, the key issues revolve around how they can work together for common inventory and measurement, plus understanding the best way to leverage their unique capabilities and information to add value in the long term.<\/p>\n

In the US the situation seems quite different \u2013 with operators continuing to try to exert a much higher degree of control over all parts of the mobile advertising process. Although there have been some high profile statements about “openness” (eg from Verizon), it seems like that philosophy still hasn’t permeated the operator organizations. The net result is a feeling that operators are still often more of a barrier<\/strong> to mobile advertising adoption in those countries, rather than a facilitator<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

“Mobile is not the web, but …”<\/span>
\nIt has been a common theme that mobile advertising should not be thought of as simply a new form of online advertising. There are different ad formats, different customer patterns, different forms of engagement, etc. However, one speaker pointed out that at a higher level, many of the key successful philosophies<\/strong> from the online world should in fact be brought over to the mobile world, for example:<\/p>\n